“Stupid strategy, if you ask me”

Here’s a video I helped produce recently for HotHouse Interactive, announcing their move down the road to new premises. Look for the Hitchcockian cameo at about the one-minute mark!

“Prius People” project

From the Zazoo blog:

Kermit the Frog was wrong: It is easy being green! Our most recent projects for Toyota Australia, created with HotHouse, have revolved around this month’s launch of the new model Prius hybrid car in Australia. The “Prius People” vodcast project employs a social media-oriented relationship-building approach, presenting a slice of life with interesting Australians. We got the chance to work with some inspiring and remarkable people including environmentalists Tim Flannery and Tanya Ha, Eye Foundation CEO Belinda Sullivan, Today Show nutritionist Joanna McMillan Price, and technology experts Peter Blasina and Nick Broughall. Three of the videos launched this week and you can see them here.

Prius People screen shot

Also with HotHouse, Zazoo implemented a blogger engagement program for Toyota as part of the Prius launch, organising information sessions for several of Australia’s top bloggers. For more information see Zazoo’s Our Work page.

We are all publishers

From the Zazoo blog:

In the digital age, if you’re a marketer you’re also a publisher. Rebecca Lieb has written a great piece in ClickZ which was republished the other day, and is well worth a read.

She argues that “Marketers have been creating content in all sorts of media in all kinds of channels since the beginning. But now that virtually every brand, manufacturer, service, and product you can think of is online (and likely runs its own Web site), content has blown wide open. Almost anyone involved in any type of online business can no longer hope to survive without a solid content strategy.”

In the 21st century equivalent of custom publishing, big brands such as Budweiser in the US even have their own online TV channel. Lieb writes: “Think of it as the online equivalent of a Disney or Warner Bros. theme park. You know the rides and merchandise are selling you something, but few people care about the church-and-state divide on branded territory.

“….Strong, well thought-out and executed content strategies create rewards for marketers. They go viral. They attract community. They can blow out SEO (search engine optimisation) to epic proportions. Rather than a company’s Web page showing up in organic results, content can generate page after page of relevant results.”

She concludes: “As an editor/marketer hybrid, I may have some bias here, but I’d be hard-pressed to think of a marketing problem that couldn’t be tackled head-on with a solid content strategy.”

Couldn’t agree more.

Stop – marketing crossing

 A little off topic, but so funny I had to put this up here. Thanks to Peter Shankman at helpareporter.com, who brought this to my attention.

http://view.break.com/542649 – Watch more free videos

Big Pharma joins the YouTube generation – literally

The Health 2.0 blog has posted an announcement from Johnson & Johnson that it has launched a health channel on YouTube. These professionally produced videos, hosted by an ex-TV correspondent and doctor who, surprise, surprise, has done consulting work for J&J, offer advice and info on a range of topics. J&J’s Director of Video Communications (as an aside, now there’s a pretty specialised role) says, “The videos are neither brand-related nor product-centric, though many of the videos cover disease states in which some of our operating companies participate.” Will be interesting so see whether they drift toward more brand and product info as time goes on…

$8 billion – and for what?

Michael Learmonth writes in the Silicon Valley Insider that in the three years since YouTube was launched, investors have spent US$8 billion on online video – and that’s just in the US.

He writes: “What did they get for their troubles? So far, next to nothing. YouTube, which accounts for more than half of all video views, will generate a mere $200 million in sales in 2008, and the industry has yet to produce a profitable company.”

But, as he points out, “Yet, while most VCs are unlikely to see any return on their investment, we don’t think $8 billion is an outrageous number. Consider:

  • Online video is in its infancy. YouTube didn’t exist four years ago.
  • 119 million people watched an online video in May.
  • $1.35 billion will be spent on online video advertising in 2008 (though much will go to video sites that weren’t venture funded, like ABC.com)
  • Advertisers poured $17 billion into broadcast and cable TV in the 2008 upfront

It also pales in comparison to other speculative investments of the past few years; Merrill Lynch wrote off $9 billion in bad mortgages in the first quarter of 2008 alone (and $29 billion since the meltdown began.)”

I don’t know about you, but I think it’s time to launch myself an online video site…

It’s all relative: Internet ads grow as economy contracts

The sub-prime economic crisis in the US is accelerating the share of ad spending on Internet advertising, according to a new IDC report.

During the next five years, Internet advertising is predicted to grow eight times as fast as traditional advertising, doubling from US$25.5 billion in 2007 to US$51.1 billion. That means by 2012 the Internet will be the second-largest area of advertising spend, behind direct marketing and in front of TV, radio, and newspapers. The Internet is currently number five on the list.

According to IDG, “Video advertising will be the principal disruptor of Internet advertising over the next five years by attracting the most new marketing dollars. Its revenue will grow sevenfold from $US0.5 billion in 2007 to $US3.8 billion in 2012 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 49.4%. This growth will take place because brand advertisers will shift significant amounts of money into these video commercials, primarily from broadcast television.”

Would love to see some equivalent statistics for Australia if anyone has them.

Life on the small screen

Following on from yesterday’s piece on citizen journalism via YouTube, comScore reports that the number of online videos viewed in the US jumped 13% in March to 11.5 billion, fuelled largely by a surge in the use of YouTube which helped lift Google’s share to 38 percent.

YouTube.com accounted for 98% of all videos viewed at Google Sites, while Fox Interactive Media ranked second with 477 million videos (4.2%). Nearly 140 million US Internet users watched an average of 83 videos per viewer in March. That’s nearly three videos a day, seven days a week.

How many online videos are you watching per day? It would be great to get some Australian figures, even if they are not scientific. Are you trolling mindlessly through YouTube daily watching drivel (guilty as charged, on occasion).

Some other interesting facts from the March stats:

  • 73.7 percent of the total U.S. Internet audience viewed online video.
  • 84.8 million viewers watched 4.3 billion videos on YouTube.com (50.4 videos per viewer).
  • 47.7 million viewers watched 400 million videos on MySpace.com (8.4 videos per viewer).
  • The average online video duration was 2.8 minutes.
  • The average online video viewer watched 235 minutes of video.
  • And now for something completely different…

    Online education at the moment is dominated by what I call ‘PowerPoint on steroids’. Out-of-the-box solutions such as Pointecast and Articulate and many bespoke systems are based on turning PowerPoint slides into Flash. Sure, you can embed video, add voiceovers and conduct interactive quizzes, but the learning is still based on reading bullet points on screen.

    Is this the best method for continuing professional development? With video getting easier and cheaper to produce online, surely there’s a way to use it more creatively than sticking talking heads in the middle of a presentation, or placing them next to scrolling bullet points (particularly when the presentation goes on for 45 minutes or more). Panel discussions, particularly if the speakers don’t all agree with each other, are one way this can be handled creatively. The Rural Health Education Foundation’s video education program is one of the very few examples of this. I wonder what the relative percentages are for people who respond best to reading off a screen vs. listening to someone talk via video?

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.